This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1527476409343801v1 10/6/482    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Weissmann, E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Paying for Fewer Imports

The BBC License Fee 1975—1981 and Attitudes toward American Imports

Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK

This article investigates the impact of the BBC license fee negotiations between 1975 and 1981 on the relationship between the broadcaster and American programming. It highlights the increasing dependence of the BBC on imported programming and on the export of content to America due to a series of below-inflation increases that left the BBC financially weakened. The article’s main concern, however, is with the management of attitudes toward American television that were exploited by key executive personnel in the United Kingdom for political ends: the campaign for a higher license fee. The author argues that the successive campaigns during the late 1970s exploited fears of Americanization to emphasize the lowering of quality in the output on the BBC, which connected to debates around public service ideals and hence, to the legitimization of the license fee. The campaigns ultimately also affected public attitudes, which increasingly registered American programming in relation to the lowering of standards on the BBC.

Key Words: transnational television • BBC • American programming • attitudes toward broadcasting

This version was published on November 1, 2009

Television & New Media, Vol. 10, No. 6, 482-500 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1527476409343801


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?