Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Television & New Media
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sewell, P. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

From Discourse to Discord: Quality and Dramedy at the End of the Classic Network System

Philip W. Sewell, PhD.*

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pwsewell{at}wustl.edu.


   Abstract
This article examines the struggle for cultural authority that occurred in critical and industrial discourse surrounding the so-called "dramedies" that premiered on network television in 1987, The Days and Nights of Molly Dodd (NBC, 1987–88, Lifetime, 1989–91), Frank’s Place (CBS, 1987–88), The Slap Maxwell Story (ABC, 1987–88), and Hooperman (ABC, 1987–89). It situates that dispute in the broader trends of the changing practices and understandings of "quality television" and the erosion of network power. The article builds on the existing scholarship on early eighties quality with a consideration of later challenges to this critical-industrial construct and specific attention to the imperatives and tactics that shaped various parties’ attempts to achieve discursive dominance. A close examination of the attempted linkage of dramedy to established markers of quality demonstrates both the contingency of the seemingly stable discourse of quality television and its reflexive resistance to change.

First published on October 23, 2009
Television & New Media 2009, doi:10.1177/1527476409351289


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?