Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Television & New Media
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hill, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Big Brother

The Real Audience

Annette Hill

University of Westminster, North wick Park Campus

In this article, the author focuses on Big Brother in relation to audience attraction. I outline the context of factual entertainment and its audience, and the specific experience of watching Big Brother. Seen in relation to factual entertainment as a whole, Big Brother is one of the least popular examples of "documentary as diversion." Seen in relation to gamedocs, Big Brother is one of the most popular examples of new factual entertainment. The author's research, which uses quantitative and qualitative audience studies, indicates that attraction to Big Brother is based on the social and performative aspects of the program. The focus on the degree of actuality, on real people's improvised performances in the program, leads to a particular viewing practice: audiences look for the moment of authenticity when real people are "really" themselves in an unreal environment. This, the author argues, is the popularity of the gamedoc, evident in its early incarnation, and writ large in Big Brother spin-offs and sub-sequent series.

Television & New Media, Vol. 3, No. 3, 323-340 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/152747640200300307


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Media Culture SocietyHome page
J. Mast
New directions in hybrid popular television: a reassessment of television mock-documentary
Media Culture Society, March 1, 2009; 31(2): 231 - 250.
[PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Cultural StudiesHome page
M. Aslama
Playing House: Participants' experiences of Big Brother Finland
International Journal of Cultural Studies, January 1, 2009; 12(1): 81 - 96.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Television New MediaHome page
B. Klein and C. Wardle
"These Two Are Speaking Welsh on Channel 4!": Welsh Representations and Cultural Tensions on Big Brother 7
Television New Media, November 1, 2008; 9(6): 514 - 530.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Cultural StudiesHome page
S. Holmes
`Riveting and real -- a family in the raw': (Re)visiting The Family (1974) after reality TV
International Journal of Cultural Studies, June 1, 2008; 11(2): 193 - 210.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Television New MediaHome page
S. Collins
Making the Most out of 15 Minutes: Reality TV's Dispensable Celebrity
Television New Media, March 1, 2008; 9(2): 87 - 110.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Television New MediaHome page
R. E. Dubrofsky
Therapeutics of the Self: Surveillance in the Service of the Therapeutic
Television New Media, November 1, 2007; 8(4): 263 - 284.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of Cultural StudiesHome page
S. Holmes
The BBC and television fame in the 1950s: Living with The Grove Family (1954-7) and going Face to Face (1959-62) with television
European Journal of Cultural Studies, November 1, 2007; 10(4): 427 - 445.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Television New MediaHome page
M. Aslama and M. Pantti
Flagging Finnishness: Reproducing National Identity in Reality Television
Television New Media, February 1, 2007; 8(1): 49 - 67.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Cultural StudiesHome page
S. Coleman
How the other half votes: Big Brother viewers and the 2005 general election
International Journal of Cultural Studies, December 1, 2006; 9(4): 457 - 479.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of Cultural StudiesHome page
M. Aslama and M. Pantti
Talking alone: reality TV, emotions and authenticity
European Journal of Cultural Studies, May 1, 2006; 9(2): 167 - 184.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of Cultural StudiesHome page
S. Holmes
Not the Final Answer: Critical Approaches to the Quiz Show and Who Wants to Be a Millionaire
European Journal of Cultural Studies, November 1, 2005; 8(4): 483 - 503.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Cultural StudiesHome page
S. Holmes
'But this Time You Choose!': Approaching the 'Interactive' Audience in Reality TV
International Journal of Cultural Studies, June 1, 2004; 7(2): 213 - 231.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Television New MediaHome page
S. Holmes
"Reality Goes Pop!": Reality TV, Popular Music, and Narratives of Stardom in Pop Idol
Television New Media, May 1, 2004; 5(2): 147 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
New Media SocietyHome page
J. M. Jones
Show Your Real Face: A Fan Study of the UK Big Brother Transmissions (2000, 2001, 2002). Investigating the Boundaries between Notions of Consumers and Producers of Factual Television
New Media Society, September 1, 2003; 5(3): 400 - 421.
[Abstract] [PDF]